The story
In March 2002 Pakistani and American forces captured Abu Zubaydah, a man the CIA believed was a senior al-Qaeda figure. He was flown to a secret CIA prison in Thailand, where interrogators kept him awake for days, confined him in a coffin sized box and waterboarded him 83 times. Over the next six years the agency held at least 119 people in a network of secret prisons, known as black sites, in countries including Afghanistan, Thailand, Poland, Romania and Lithuania. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the planner of the September 11 attacks, was waterboarded 183 times. At least one prisoner, Gul Rahman, died of hypothermia at the Salt Pit near Kabul in November 2002.
The program began with a presidential order signed on September 17, 2001, giving the CIA authority to capture and detain terrorism suspects. Justice Department lawyers wrote memos in August 2002 that narrowly defined torture, and the agency used those memos to approve what it called enhanced interrogation techniques. Prisoners were moved between countries by secret flights, a practice called extraordinary rendition, and the International Committee of the Red Cross was kept away.
President George W. Bush acknowledged the program in September 2006, when 14 prisoners were moved to Guantanamo Bay. In 2005 the CIA destroyed 92 videotapes of interrogations. President Barack Obama banned the techniques by executive order in January 2009. In December 2014 the Senate Intelligence Committee released a roughly 500 page summary of its 6,700 page study, concluding that the methods were more brutal than the CIA had told policymakers and did not produce intelligence unavailable by other means, a conclusion the CIA disputed.
Why it mattered
- Disclosure of the program led to an executive order in 2009 and a 2015 law limiting U.S. interrogation to methods in the Army Field Manual.
- European courts later ruled that Poland, Romania and Lithuania had violated human rights by hosting black sites.
- Evidence tainted by torture has complicated the military commission trials of the September 11 accused at Guantanamo for more than two decades.
- The debate over whether torture works became a lasting fault line in American politics and culture.
Sources
- Committee Releases Study of the CIA's Detention and Interrogation Program Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
- S. Rept. 113-288: Committee Study of the CIA's Detention and Interrogation Program Congress.gov
- Key findings from the Senate report on CIA torture Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
- CIA director disputes findings of Senate interrogation report NPR
- Senate torture report describes CIA interrogation program Fortune
- CIA Destroyed 92 Interrogation Tapes Human Rights First
- Europe's Human Rights Court Shines More Light on the CIA's Black Site Torture Program Open Society Justice Initiative
- Psychologists behind CIA enhanced interrogation program settle detainees lawsuit NPR
- Terror memos authorized harsh interrogation techniques Christian Science Monitor
Drafted by AI (Claude) from the sources above and checked against them by AI; no historian has reviewed this page. Spot a mistake? Suggest a correction. How pages are made
Contested history
Consensus: The program is documented by declassified CIA cables, Justice Department memos, Red Cross reports and the 2014 Senate Intelligence Committee study. What remains disputed is whether the methods produced unique, life saving intelligence.
- CIA director disputes findings of Senate interrogation report NPR
- Key findings from the Senate report on CIA torture Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
- Terror memos authorized harsh interrogation techniques Christian Science Monitor
- Senate torture report describes CIA interrogation program Fortune
Community notes
Loading notes…