Sign in
Government & LawInformation Age

CIA black sites and the torture program

2002Big momentContested

After September 11 the CIA held over a hundred terrorism suspects in secret prisons abroad and subjected many to waterboarding and other brutal methods, later documented by a 2014 Senate report.

The story

In March 2002 Pakistani and American forces captured Abu Zubaydah, a man the CIA believed was a senior al-Qaeda figure. He was flown to a secret CIA prison in Thailand, where interrogators kept him awake for days, confined him in a coffin sized box and waterboarded him 83 times. Over the next six years the agency held at least 119 people in a network of secret prisons, known as black sites, in countries including Afghanistan, Thailand, Poland, Romania and Lithuania. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the planner of the September 11 attacks, was waterboarded 183 times. At least one prisoner, Gul Rahman, died of hypothermia at the Salt Pit near Kabul in November 2002.

The program began with a presidential order signed on September 17, 2001, giving the CIA authority to capture and detain terrorism suspects. Justice Department lawyers wrote memos in August 2002 that narrowly defined torture, and the agency used those memos to approve what it called enhanced interrogation techniques. Prisoners were moved between countries by secret flights, a practice called extraordinary rendition, and the International Committee of the Red Cross was kept away.

President George W. Bush acknowledged the program in September 2006, when 14 prisoners were moved to Guantanamo Bay. In 2005 the CIA destroyed 92 videotapes of interrogations. President Barack Obama banned the techniques by executive order in January 2009. In December 2014 the Senate Intelligence Committee released a roughly 500 page summary of its 6,700 page study, concluding that the methods were more brutal than the CIA had told policymakers and did not produce intelligence unavailable by other means, a conclusion the CIA disputed.

Why it mattered

  • Disclosure of the program led to an executive order in 2009 and a 2015 law limiting U.S. interrogation to methods in the Army Field Manual.
  • European courts later ruled that Poland, Romania and Lithuania had violated human rights by hosting black sites.
  • Evidence tainted by torture has complicated the military commission trials of the September 11 accused at Guantanamo for more than two decades.
  • The debate over whether torture works became a lasting fault line in American politics and culture.

Drafted by AI (Claude) from the sources above and checked against them by AI; no historian has reviewed this page. Spot a mistake? Suggest a correction. How pages are made

Contested history

Consensus: The program is documented by declassified CIA cables, Justice Department memos, Red Cross reports and the 2014 Senate Intelligence Committee study. What remains disputed is whether the methods produced unique, life saving intelligence.

The CIA ran secret prisons abroad and used waterboarding and other brutal methodsEstablished
President Bush acknowledged the program in 2006, and the Senate study, built from millions of CIA records, documents the sites and the techniques used on specific prisoners.
The techniques produced intelligence that could not have been obtained otherwise, including leads to Osama bin LadenDebated
The Senate majority found no case where the methods produced unique, otherwise unobtainable intelligence. CIA Director John Brennan and former officials replied that detainees who went through the program provided useful information, while conceding it is unknowable whether other methods would have worked.
The CIA misled the White House, Congress and the public about the programDebated
The Senate study concluded the agency repeatedly gave inaccurate accounts of the methods' brutality and effectiveness. The CIA's 2013 response and the committee's Republican minority rejected many of those findings.
The methods amounted to tortureMatter of opinion
Justice Department memos of 2002 said they did not meet the legal definition, a position later withdrawn. The Senate committee chair, President Obama and many legal scholars called them torture; some former officials still reject the word.

Community notes

Loading notes…

Learn more ranked by votes

BookJane Mayer
The Dark Side
Editor's pick
BookJames E. Mitchell
Enhanced Interrogation
Editor's pick