The story
The International Criminal Court began work on July 1, 2002, when the Rome Statute entered into force after its 60th ratification. Based in The Hague, it is the first permanent international court that can try individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and, since 2018, the crime of aggression. It can act only when national courts are unwilling or unable to do so, a principle called complementarity.
The idea went back to Nuremberg, and the UN had discussed a permanent court since the late 1940s, but the Cold War stalled it. The war in the former Yugoslavia and the 1994 genocide in Rwanda led the UN Security Council to create temporary tribunals, which showed both the value and the cost of one-off courts. Delegates in Rome adopted the Statute on July 17, 1998, by a vote of 120 to 7, with 21 abstentions. More than 120 states are now parties, but the United States, Russia, China and India are not. Its first verdict came in 2012, against the Congolese militia leader Thomas Lubanga, and arrest warrants for sitting leaders, such as Sudan's Omar al-Bashir in 2009, have tested its reach and drawn criticism from some African and other governments.
Why it mattered
- It created a permanent forum for prosecuting the gravest crimes, replacing one-off tribunals.
- It established the principle that heads of state and top officials can be held personally accountable.
- It gave victims a voice in proceedings and a route to reparations.
- Its dependence on state cooperation, and the absence of major powers, limit its reach and fuel debate.
Sources
- Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court adopted EBSCO Research Starters
- International Criminal Court (ICC) Britannica
- ICC First verdict: Thomas Lubanga guilty of conscripting and enlisting children under the age of 15 International Criminal Court
Community notes
Loading notes…