Sign in

My Lai massacre

1968Big momentContested

On March 16, 1968, U.S. soldiers killed hundreds of unarmed villagers at My Lai in South Vietnam; the Army covered it up for over a year until a soldier's letters and Seymour Hersh's reporting exposed it.

The story

On the morning of March 16, 1968, soldiers of Charlie Company, 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry, entered the hamlet of My Lai, part of Son My village in Quang Ngai province, South Vietnam. Expecting to find a Viet Cong battalion, they found only civilians, mostly women, children and old men. Over about four hours they killed between 347 and 504 people, according to U.S. Army and Vietnamese counts, shooting them in ditches and huts and committing rapes. No weapons were found. Helicopter pilot Hugh Thompson landed between the soldiers and fleeing villagers and ordered his crew to cover them, saving some lives.

The killings happened in the aftermath of the Tet Offensive, in a province where Charlie Company had lost men to mines and snipers and where commanders measured success by body counts. The official report described a victory with 128 enemy killed. A brief inquiry by the division found nothing wrong, and the Army's reports buried the truth for more than a year. In March 1969 former soldier Ronald Ridenhour, who had heard accounts from comrades, sent letters to Congress and the Pentagon.

In November 1969 Seymour Hersh broke the story, and photographs taken by Army photographer Ronald Haeberle appeared in print. A commission led by General William Peers concluded in 1970 that there had been a massacre and a cover up at multiple levels, finding that at least 30 people knew of the atrocity, of whom 14 were charged. Only Lieutenant William Calley was convicted, in March 1971, of murdering 22 civilians. Sentenced to life, he served about three and a half years, mostly under house arrest.

Why it mattered

  • Revelation of the massacre turned many Americans against the Vietnam War and deepened distrust of official accounts.
  • The Peers inquiry's findings on the cover up became a landmark case study in military ethics training.
  • The case fueled debate over individual and command responsibility for war crimes that continues today.

Drafted by AI (Claude) from the sources above and checked against them by AI; no historian has reviewed this page. Spot a mistake? Suggest a correction. How pages are made

Contested history

Consensus: The Peers Commission and court-martial records establish the massacre and the Army's cover up. Debate continues over the death toll and over how far responsibility extended.

U.S. soldiers massacred hundreds of unarmed civilians at My LaiEstablished
The Army's own Peers inquiry and court-martial testimony establish the killings in detail.
Read this view
The Army covered up the massacreEstablished
The Peers Commission found suppression of information at multiple levels of command and recommended charges against officers for the cover up.
Calley was a scapegoat for decisions made higher upMatter of opinion
Many Americans at the time saw Calley as punished for carrying out orders, while others argued he bore direct responsibility and that more officers should also have been convicted.
Read this view
My Lai was an isolated incidentDebated
Some historians see it as an aberration, while others, citing later investigations of other units, argue civilian killings were more widespread than acknowledged.
Read this view

Community notes

Loading notes…

Learn more ranked by votes

BookMichael Bilton
Four Hours in My Lai
Editor's pick
BookSeymour M. Hersh
My Lai 4
Editor's pick
VideoSearch on YouTube
My Lai massacre 1968 documentary
Editor's pick