Sign in
Industrial AgeEconomy & Trade

Indian indentured labor system

1834MajorContested

After slavery's abolition, about 1.3 million Indians are shipped to Mauritius, the Caribbean, Fiji, Natal and elsewhere as indentured laborers between 1834 and 1920.

The story

Beginning in 1834, when the ship Atlas carried laborers from Calcutta to Mauritius, planters in British colonies recruited workers from India under indenture contracts, usually five years, in return for passage, food and low wages. Between 1834 and 1920 about 1.3 million Indians, mostly from the poor regions of Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Madras, went to Mauritius, British Guiana, Trinidad, Jamaica, Natal, Fiji, Malaya and other places. The French, Dutch and Portuguese ran similar schemes, such as to Reunion and Suriname.

The British Empire ended slavery in 1833, with a short 'apprenticeship' period, and planters of sugar and other crops faced a labor shortage, since freed people would often leave the plantations or demand wages. India, under the East India Company and then the Crown, had a large population in poverty, and recruiters, called arkatis, found workers using promises and sometimes deception. Journeys by sailing ship took months and mortality on some voyages was high. On the plantations, conditions were often harsh, with long hours, physical punishment and legal penalties for leaving work, and the system included wage and contract violations.

The system's critics, including Indian nationalists and British officials, argued it was a kind of slavery by another name, and the historian Hugh Tinker titled his study of it A New System of Slavery. Others note that some workers chose to stay, prospered and built new communities. Mahatma Gandhi, then in South Africa, became involved in campaigns against indenture, and Indian nationalists such as Gopal Krishna Gokhale pressed for an end. The Indian government stopped emigration under indenture in 1917 and the system was formally abolished in 1920. Today millions of people of Indian origin live in Mauritius, Guyana, Trinidad, Fiji and South Africa.

Why it mattered

  • Large Indian communities formed in the Caribbean, Indian Ocean islands, Fiji and South Africa, shaping the politics of those countries.
  • Plantation economies recovered from abolition, with sugar production continuing to grow in Mauritius and Guyana.
  • Opposition to indenture, including Gandhi's work in South Africa, became part of the Indian nationalist movement.
  • The system helped define modern debates about coerced and contract labor, which continue in discussions of migrant workers.

Sources

  1. The Agreement and the Girmitiya Harvard Law Review
  2. The Political Economy of Indian Indentured Labor in the Nineteenth Century Journal of the History of Economic Thought (Cambridge)
  3. Aapravasi Ghat Britannica
  4. Slavery and Labour Contracts: Rethinking Their Nexus International Review of Social History (Cambridge)
  5. Of Journeys and Transformations (Doug Munro) ANU Press

Contested history

Consensus: Indenture was a system of contract labor with real elements of coercion and high mortality, and historians disagree on whether it should be called a form of slavery.

Indenture was a 'new system of slavery' in practiceDebated
Hugh Tinker argued that deception in recruitment, harsh discipline and penal sanctions for leaving work made it close to slavery.
Read this view
Indenture was a voluntary contract system that offered a route out of povertyDebated
Others stress that workers signed contracts, many returned or settled and prospered, and legal protections gradually improved.
Conditions varied widely by colony and periodEstablished
Mortality, wages and treatment differed between places such as Mauritius, Natal, Fiji and the Caribbean, and between decades.
Read this view

Community notes

Loading notes…

Learn more ranked by votes